On the anniversary of the 24th Amendment, a look at NC’s modern-day poll taxes

CRSIP logoYesterday in 1964, the U.S. House of Representatives passed the 24th Amendment, which prohibited the government from issuing taxes on voting participation in federal elections. Ratified in January, 1964, the Amendment laid the foundation for expanded voter protection from poll taxes at all levels of government. The poll tax had long-been a principal impediment to African American participation in elections and thus was instrumental to perpetuating American Apartheid since Reconstruction. The Amendment radically changed the nation’s voting landscape by making it possible for citizens of color to enjoy the same privileges of full citizenship as their white neighbors.

In view of the Amendment’s gravity and historic reach, we wish we could celebrate the occasion in the manner of jubilant optimism which befits the spirit of its passage. Given present-day hostilities to equal-protection in elections, however, we’re marking it instead with a solemn review of what recently resurrected financial barriers to access (read: modern-day poll taxes) challenge North Carolina’s voters anew.

In 2012, 318,644 registered North Carolina voters lacked DMV-issued photo IDs with names that matched those found on their voter registration cards, according to data collected and posted by the State Board of Elections*. A review of this data showed that North Carolina’s so-called “monster voting law” (rolled out in part this year and which will require a voter to present a valid photo-ID beginning in 2016) will disproportionally burden African Americans, women, and young people.

Consider the following: Although the percentage of white voters was greater than that of African Americans’ in terms of voter registration and the aforementioned “no-match” list, African American voters were nearly twice as likely to lack a valid form of voter-ID that will be required to vote in North Carolina in 2016.**

Voter-ID Impact

Voter-ID disproportionately burdens African American voters

Andrew Cohen, writing for The Atlantic last year, identified some of the challenges involved in acquiring a valid form of state-issued photo-ID:

“If you cannot afford to drive, and thus don’t need a driver’s license, the idea of getting a photo identification is much more daunting. Since you don’t drive, it’s difficult to get to and from a government office to get your new photo identification. Maybe most of your friends and family don’t drive, either. Or maybe you are too old or too ill to get behind the wheel. Or maybe you cannot get time off from your hourly job. Or maybe the cost of getting there, in terms of transportation fees and lost work hours, is prohibitive.”

These real costs in time and treasure are further compounded if voters don’t already have the necessary documents to obtain a DMV-issued photo-ID. Add to that running tally of expenses to vote the missed hours from work, the transit costs, and the extra energy expended to procure every document, whether it be a copy of a birth certificate, social security card, tax form, school document, marriage certificate, or military record. Cohen rightly notes that each of these scenarios exists as a barrier to voting access and that’s built onto a pre-existing landscape of American inequality.

Modern-day poll taxes aren’t limited simply to the costs to acquiring a valid voter-ID, either. They’re manifest also as hours lost waiting in line to cast a ballot.

With North Carolina’s newly-reduced early voting period this November, voters can expect to miss more hours from work waiting in lines to vote than in those elections of recent past.

Voters won’t get a receipt for today’s poll taxes because they’re cunningly disguised as costs that already and disproportionately affect minorities and the working poor. This ruse may make it easier for voter-ID proponents to shill their agenda but it doesn’t change the fact that North Carolina’s pernicious voting law creates modern-day poll taxes that recall historic failures in American democracy. The fact that the law’s provisions are designed to discourage political participation from segments of the state’s voting population speaks volumes about the  “integrity” of North Carolina’s voter-ID proponents.

Sarah Moncelle is a Researcher/New Media Specialist at SCSJ

*This data set was originally requested by the North Carolina General Assembly while it considered SB589, which later became the “NC Voter Integrity Act.” Source: ftp://alt.ncsbe.gov/Requests/Unmatched%20Voters_DMVID.xlsx

**Note: The voter registration records noted here are contemporaneous with those data found in the North Carolina State Board of Elections’ April 2013 DMV report.

Written By Southern Coalition for Social Justice

On the anniversary of the 24th Amendment, a look at NC’s modern-day poll taxes was originally published @ Southern Coalition for Social Justice and has been syndicated with permission.

Our authors want to hear from you! Click to leave a comment

Related Posts

Subscribe to the SJS Weekly Newsletter

Leave a Reply